Stewart Sargent

My feedback

  1. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with:
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    RECEIVED  ·  0 comments  ·  Water Distribution » Productivity  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Stewart Sargent supported this idea  · 
  2. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with:
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    RECEIVED  ·  0 comments  ·  Water Distribution » Productivity  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Stewart Sargent supported this idea  · 
  3. 7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with:
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    RECEIVED  ·  2 comments  ·  Water Distribution » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Stewart Sargent supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stewart Sargent commented  · 

    Some of the InfoSWMM HGL functionality would be good.... eg Add or Subt nodes

  4. 8 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with:
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    RECEIVED  ·  3 comments  ·  Water Distribution » Operational Modeling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Stewart Sargent supported this idea  · 
  5. 11 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with:
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    RECEIVED  ·  1 comment  ·  Storm Sewer & Flood Modeling » Visualization  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Stewart Sargent supported this idea  · 
  6. 34 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with:
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    ON ROADMAP  ·  0 comments  ·  Storm Sewer & Flood Modeling » Productivity  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Stewart Sargent supported this idea  · 
  7. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with:
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Water Distribution » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Stewart Sargent supported this idea  · 
  8. 8 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with:
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    RECEIVED  ·  3 comments  ·  Water Distribution  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Stewart Sargent supported this idea  · 
  9. 6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with:
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    RECEIVED  ·  1 comment  ·  Water Distribution » Engine  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Stewart Sargent supported this idea  · 
  10. 24 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with:
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Storm Sewer & Flood Modeling » Productivity  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    The approach which we are looking to leverage here is one which deviates a little from the original request but gives the same ability to interrogate results part way through a simulation. After investigating options, the best appears to be to have a run for the total duration you are interested in, then set a state saving checkbox in the run and when you wish to interrogate simulation results stop the simulation. We will then make use of ICMLive developed concatenation of results to allow us to tie in the “continuation run” with the results which were stopped earlier. There is a lot more detail to this than I can add here, but it should meet the need.

    Stewart Sargent supported this idea  · 
  11. 34 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with:
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Storm Sewer & Flood Modeling » Productivity  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We have spent quite a bit of time investigating how validation improvements might be achieved, whether that be through validation as a background task or whether it be with improvements on the speed of validation in the first place.

    There is no silver bullet which has been identified so far, the validation is already very efficient with minimal potential for speed improvements and there are issues with it as a background task as previously mentioned which we haven’t got fully fledged solutions to yet.

    Stewart Sargent supported this idea  · 
  12. 61 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with:
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    IN DISCUSSION  ·  0 comments  ·  Storm Sewer & Flood Modeling » Productivity  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Stewart Sargent supported this idea  · 
  13. 10 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with:
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    RECEIVED  ·  3 comments  ·  Storm Sewer & Flood Modeling » Hydraulics  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Stewart Sargent commented  · 

    ArcWater is already available for PRO. So for users like us who use both Water AND SWMM (or SEWER) and need to stay using only ver of ArcGIS then we CANNOT take advantage of latest infoWATER (yet :) ). IMHO... :) The situation is: counter productive, bad for marketing, and will make extra work for SUPPORT (having the continue to support the old infoWATER for longer.)

    Stewart Sargent supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base