Ann Pugh

My feedback

  1. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    RECEIVED  ·  0 comments  ·  Storm Sewer & Flood Modeling » Hydraulics  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ann Pugh shared this idea  · 
  2. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Water Distribution » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ann Pugh shared this idea  · 
  3. 20 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    IN DEVELOPMENT  ·  2 comments  ·  Water Distribution » Productivity  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ann Pugh supported this idea  · 
  4. 7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    RECEIVED  ·  1 comment  ·  Water Distribution » Operational Modeling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ann Pugh supported this idea  · 
  5. 7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    IN DISCUSSION  ·  1 comment  ·  Water Distribution » Operational Modeling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Ann Pugh commented  · 

    Could we also then have a sum of EP in the Network Overview. The current network overview sums the number of Customer Points not properties

    Ann Pugh supported this idea  · 
  6. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    RECEIVED  ·  0 comments  ·  Asset Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ann Pugh supported this idea  · 
  7. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    RECEIVED  ·  0 comments  ·  Asset Management » Reporting  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ann Pugh supported this idea  · 
  8. 7 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    RECEIVED  ·  0 comments  ·  Asset Management  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ann Pugh supported this idea  · 
  9. 8 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    ON ROADMAP  ·  0 comments  ·  Asset Management » Reporting  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ann Pugh supported this idea  · 
  10. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    RECEIVED  ·  0 comments  ·  Storm Sewer & Flood Modeling » Productivity  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ann Pugh supported this idea  · 
  11. 8 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    RECEIVED  ·  1 comment  ·  Storm Sewer & Flood Modeling » Productivity  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ann Pugh shared this idea  · 
  12. 22 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Storm Sewer & Flood Modeling » Productivity  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    The approach which we are looking to leverage here is one which deviates a little from the original request but gives the same ability to interrogate results part way through a simulation. After investigating options, the best appears to be to have a run for the total duration you are interested in, then set a state saving checkbox in the run and when you wish to interrogate simulation results stop the simulation. We will then make use of ICMLive developed concatenation of results to allow us to tie in the “continuation run” with the results which were stopped earlier. There is a lot more detail to this than I can add here, but it should meet the need.

    Ann Pugh shared this idea  · 
  13. 50 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Storm Sewer & Flood Modeling » Productivity  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We are investigating how this might be achieved, but initial indicators are showing that this is a very significant technical effort to complete so would need to be done over several releases.

    Ann Pugh shared this idea  · 
  14. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    RECEIVED  ·  0 comments  ·  Asset Management » Data Exchange  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Ann Pugh supported this idea  · 
    Ann Pugh shared this idea  · 
  15. 9 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Storm Sewer & Flood Modeling » Hydraulics  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thank you for the addition of this request, we are in discussions about how this might be achieved as the level of awareness of tasks is varied between agents. Would a dashboard showing who sent which simulation where (which are still ongoing) be sufficient? This would be without the progress those simulations have already made available as a first step.

    Ann Pugh supported this idea  · 
  16. 21 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Storm Sewer & Flood Modeling » 2D Flooding  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We are looking into this, but for the majority of cases it might be that there is already a significant improvement related to this with the new “Clip meshing” which was released with version 11.0 of the software, but in a prototype state, please ensure outputs are reviewed before use. The reason it provides an improvement is that it does a coarse mesh first (which is likely to remain unchanged if only small amendments are made) and follows this with a more detailed mesh after. It would be great to get any feedback you might have on your experiences with the Clip meshing and consistency of results.

    Ann Pugh supported this idea  · 
  17. 29 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Storm Sewer & Flood Modeling » Productivity  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We have spent quite a bit of time investigating how validation improvements might be achieved, whether that be through validation as a background task or whether it be with improvements on the speed of validation in the first place.

    There is no silver bullet which has been identified so far, the validation is already very efficient with minimal potential for speed improvements and there are issues with it as a background task as previously mentioned which we haven’t got fully fledged solutions to yet.

    Ann Pugh supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base