'Wuyts Rob'

My feedback

  1. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    MORE INFO NEEDED  ·  1 comment  ·  Storm Sewer & Flood Modeling » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    'Wuyts Rob' commented  · 

    Sometimes 2 or more models have to be merged. Sometimes these models have been made with both a level with each a different timestep. When these models have to be merged, we have to interpolate one of the levels before merging the levels together. It would be easy that ICM interpolates the level. Also this is needed when an additional outfall has been created for which the (by a watercourse manager) delivered water levels (that are going to be used as a level). Since the levels are made by 1) copying the original level, 2) changing the timestep and interpolate again the values so the original water levels are again at the correct timestep and 3) add the new profile. So the idea was to, when changing the timestep, ICM will ask what to do: a) fit the existing value in the new timesteps and interpolate the timesteps in between, b) leave the timesteps in between on 0 or c) make a constant for the timesteps in between. For example: let's say the level on timestep 5min is 10 mAD and at 10min it is 3 mAD. When we then change (for whatever reason) the timestep to 1 min, it would be useful that for each timestep in between (6, 7, 8 and 9 mins) the level would be determined by ICM. In our idea for a) 9 mAD, 8 mAD, 7 mAD, 6 mAD for b) all 0 or c) all 10 mAD.

    'Wuyts Rob' shared this idea  · 
  2. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    RECEIVED  ·  0 comments  ·  Storm Sewer & Flood Modeling » Data Exchange  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    'Wuyts Rob' supported this idea  · 
  3. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    RECEIVED  ·  0 comments  ·  Storm Sewer & Flood Modeling » Other  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    'Wuyts Rob' supported this idea  · 
  4. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    RECEIVED  ·  0 comments  ·  Storm Sewer & Flood Modeling » Hydraulics  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    'Wuyts Rob' supported this idea  · 
  5. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    RECEIVED  ·  0 comments  ·  Storm Sewer & Flood Modeling » Visualization  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    'Wuyts Rob' shared this idea  · 
  6. 3 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    RECEIVED  ·  0 comments  ·  Storm Sewer & Flood Modeling » Visualization  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    'Wuyts Rob' shared this idea  · 
  7. 11 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    RECEIVED  ·  0 comments  ·  Storm Sewer & Flood Modeling » Hydraulics  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    'Wuyts Rob' supported this idea  · 
  8. 29 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Storm Sewer & Flood Modeling » Productivity  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We have spent quite a bit of time investigating how validation improvements might be achieved, whether that be through validation as a background task or whether it be with improvements on the speed of validation in the first place.

    There is no silver bullet which has been identified so far, the validation is already very efficient with minimal potential for speed improvements and there are issues with it as a background task as previously mentioned which we haven’t got fully fledged solutions to yet.

    'Wuyts Rob' supported this idea  · 
  9. 25 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    ON ROADMAP  ·  0 comments  ·  Storm Sewer & Flood Modeling » Productivity  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    'Wuyts Rob' supported this idea  · 
  10. 5 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    RECEIVED  ·  0 comments  ·  Drainage Design » Design/Sizing Tools  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    'Wuyts Rob' supported this idea  · 
  11. 50 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Storm Sewer & Flood Modeling » Productivity  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    We are investigating how this might be achieved, but initial indicators are showing that this is a very significant technical effort to complete so would need to be done over several releases.

    'Wuyts Rob' supported this idea  · 
  12. 4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    RECEIVED  ·  1 comment  ·  Storm Sewer & Flood Modeling » Productivity  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    'Wuyts Rob' supported this idea  · 
  13. 2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    RECEIVED  ·  0 comments  ·  Storm Sewer & Flood Modeling » Live Modeling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    'Wuyts Rob' supported this idea  · 
  14. 9 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    RECEIVED  ·  0 comments  ·  Storm Sewer & Flood Modeling » River Modeling  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    'Wuyts Rob' supported this idea  · 
  15. 20 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    IN DEVELOPMENT  ·  0 comments  ·  Storm Sewer & Flood Modeling » Hydraulics  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    'Wuyts Rob' supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base